"The Metamorphosis" by Peter Kuper is a comic book
of the original adaption. It almost expressed the story and talking of original
“The Metamorphosis”. It also had some change, or we can say it is Kuper’s
understanding of The Metamorphosis. For historical reasons, Kuper changed some
importance when he created the book, but it cannot hinder we read the work and made
comment it.
Kuper changed some details in his work. In the comic
book, the father is a fat, ugly and old man. When he draws the hero, author
gives him a good face. As the insect, the face looks like a human face. It has a
wealth of expression, and it is pitiful when people read. It is an important
point of comic. The comic usually need to prettify advantages and uglify
disadvantages. The author often uses overstated technique of expression to draw
the most important things. Kuper omitted many details like the father’s feeling
and the family status, and he highlight the things he wants to say.
In summary, Kuper’s book can save reader’s time and help
reader to know the story. It also changed some details and some original
meaning. If we just want to know the story, Kuper’s book is a good choice, but
if we want to consider the original meaning or know Kafka, it is better to read
the original book.
Work
Cited
Dale, Graham R., et al.
"Exploiting the e-Serialization of nano-fiction to enhance undergraduate
health and safety lectures: A back to the future perspective." Journal of
Chemical Health & Safety 19.3 (2012): 23+. Academic OneFile. Web. 30 May
2012.
You tried in your comparative analysis of the story and the comics. But I could not find the items that make the story and the comics different or similar to each other. In my opinion, you were just given a general view of what you think about the story and comics, and you forgot to state main points that make the story similar or different from each other. All the same, you tried.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Tanyi. I had a hard time picking out your points and what exaclty your arguement was,but overall it was nice to read your point of view.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the previous comments. I wasn't sure what exactly your argument was. Perhaps you tried to explain the fact that the comic was more detailed and showed the reader more of than the actual original text. You have gray supporting details. You just needed a more comprehensible answer to your question.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the previous comments. I wasn't sure what exactly your argument was. Perhaps you tried to explain the fact that the comic was more detailed and showed the reader more of than the actual original text. You have gray supporting details. You just needed a more comprehensible answer to your question.
ReplyDeleteYea, im not gonna beat a dead horse. The comments above covered it. I chose to do the movie and didnt really look into the comic, so I still got a little insight into the comic v book side of the assignment. Thank you
ReplyDeleteI agree with you if your in a hurry Kuper's comic is the best work to choose. Although I do like the comic better than the actual story.
ReplyDelete